In recent NFL discussions, former quarterback Dan Orlovsky has stirred the pot by suggesting that the Cleveland Browns should consider starting Jameis Winston over Deshaun Watson. His argument is based on several key points, including performance metrics, fit within the system, and the overall strategic direction of the team.
Orlovsky argues that Jameis Winston, despite his reputation for being a high-risk, high-reward quarterback, could be a better fit for the Browns’ current offensive setup than Deshaun Watson. He points out that Winston’s style of play—characterized by a strong arm, aggressive downfield passing, and a willingness to take risks—might align well with the Browns’ offensive philosophy. The Browns have a talented receiving corps and a solid offensive line, elements that could maximize Winston’s strengths. By leveraging Winston’s ability to make big plays and stretch the field, the Browns could enhance their offensive production.
Conversely, Orlovsky critiques Watson’s recent performance, suggesting that he has struggled to return to his pre-suspension form. Since his return from an extended absence, Watson has faced difficulties in regaining his previous level of play. Orlovsky argues that Watson’s inconsistency, combined with his hefty contract, might not provide the best value for the Browns at this time. In contrast, Winston, who is often seen as more volatile but less financially burdensome, might offer a better short-term solution.
Additionally, Orlovsky highlights the potential for Winston to thrive under less pressure. He suggests that with the right environment and a more supportive offensive scheme, Winston could deliver a level of performance that surpasses expectations. The argument here is not just about who is the better quarterback overall but who is the better fit for the Browns’ current needs and situation.
Orlovsky’s perspective also includes a broader strategic viewpoint. He implies that starting Winston could be a way for the Browns to evaluate their quarterback situation more dynamically, potentially allowing them to make a more informed decision about their long-term future at the position. This approach might help them avoid being overly committed to a struggling Watson and instead use Winston’s play as a barometer for the team’s overall offensive capabilities.
In summary, Dan Orlovsky’s suggestion to start Jameis Winston over Deshaun Watson is rooted in a combination of performance analysis, fit with the team’s offensive system, and strategic flexibility. While Watson’s potential is undeniable, Orlovsky believes that Winston’s style and current value could better serve the Browns’ immediate and future goals.
